This is a great explanation of how Chief Justice Roberts screwed up a simple 35 word oath.
Op-Ed Contributor - Oaf of Office - NYTimes.com: "How could a famous stickler for grammar have bungled that 35-word passage, among the best-known words in the Constitution? Conspiracy theorists and connoisseurs of Freudian slips have surmised that it was unconscious retaliation for Senator Obama’s vote against the chief justice’s confirmation in 2005. But a simpler explanation is that the wayward adverb in the passage is blowback from Chief Justice Roberts’s habit of grammatical niggling."
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment